Skip to main content

Ohio to Frederick Douglass, March 14, 1855

D6744_Page_1

For Frederick Douglass' Paper.

MR. EDITOR:—How pervasive, influential, almost omnipotent, is American prejudice against a colored man! How it enters every cranny and crevice of American society! In the college, the law school and the theological seminary, it stands like a frowning monster. In politics, religion, literature and the arts, its lighting influence blasts and deadens every beautiful and inviting prospect.—Indeed, in all the diocese ramifications of American life, it is to be found as a hellish genius, breathing out death and destruction to every colored person who aspires to manhood and its dignities. It knows no favorite among us. It lays its bloody clutches upon us all—upon the educated and refined among us as well as upon the ignorant and degraded. Truly, a colored person might be a very Socrates, Demosthenes, Euripides, possessing all the excellencies of a thorough education, and a deep and comprehensive reading, with all the culture and refinement of the most finished and elegant modern society, and yet he cannot escape the foul effects of this fell power. It breathes upon all his aspirations an influence more deadly than the exhalations of the Upas. How we are well-nigh compelled to adopt the language of the sacred bard, when he said: "But I am a worm, and no man—a reproach of men, and despised of the people. All they that see me, laugh me to scorn; they shoot out the lips; they shake the hand."

This train of reflection has been suggested to me by a fact which recently came to my knowledge. In an adjoining town, (North Amherst,) there is a Temperance Association known as the "Ark." It seem to be the desire of many of the members, and these among the most prominent and active of them, that John Mercer Langston should become a member of this Association. Accordingly, after a conversation with him in regard to the Constitution and the general character of the "Ark," without his knowledge, one of the most influential and respected members introduced a motion after the usual manner, to this effect, that J. M. Langston is a proper person to become a member of Ark No. 9. When the proposition was made, it was at once unanimously adopted. At a subsequent meeting of the "Ark," however, it was reconsidered. But after a very spirited debate, it was again sustained by a vote of thirty-six to seventeen.

In this Association there are some of the right sort of men and women—some who understand how to look at a man in some other way than through the medium of his skin—some who can see worth and excellence in a black man as well as in a white one.—This statement you will find fully confirmed in reading the following essay, read before the "Ark," at one of its weekly meetings, by Mr. James Frisbie, a truehearted anti-slavery man as well as a devoted temperance man.

D6744_Page_2

"As I am appointed to read to you this evening, I am disposed to feel somewhat at home, and select a subject which seems to have excited a profound interest among the whites (members.) In fact, the circumstances of the case imperatively demand that I should have my whereabouts in these times of reconsiderations.

It seems that some of the members of the Ark and myself do not exactly agree on a proposition which I had the honor to introduce a few evenings ago for your consideration viz.: that J. M. Langston is a proper person to become a member of the Ark No. 9.—I am glad to know that I am called upon, not
by the Ark as a whole, to defend my proposition, but by a minority.

That Mr. Langston is a person I never had a doubt. He certainly looks much like one[.] He thinks, reasons and talks; eats, drinks, sleeps, and walks erect[.] I never yet saw him creep, or move on all fours[.] His neighbors so consider and treat him. And the law, as it taxes him and holds him to a strict obedience, places him in the condition of a person.

But he is a fit person to sail in the Ark, if the Ark is not a humbug and does not use language without meaning For she has inscribed upon her banner, "Love, Purity and Fidelity[.]" Love for members of the Ark, and for all mankind; and if Mr. Langston is not of the man sort, it is because his father, like the father of some members of the Ark was white. Besides, the term Ark seems to imply a place of safety, a retreat, a home for all poor creatures, who, in their escape from the pollutions of the world, need a resting place. Certainly the world needs reforming. And I had supposed that the Ark was a reformatory institution contending for the right and battling the wrong—dispensing good to all and lifting up the bowed down.

But more than this, the Ark has been wonderfully eulogized by several of the members as being a benevolent association, a philanthropic enterprize. So I was presumptuous enough to think those benevolent aims could encircle a man as well as a brutish man, and that "love and fidelity" would bring him near home. Come to "purity," however, and I find that I have not understood it in all its bearings. I now see that it is a comprehensive term, implying full blood, clear, free from anything that brings a jag in the race, or any freak in nature, whereby a human being is distinguished from an Anglo Saxon.—And now I know that the declaration of the Ark, "Love, Purity and Fidelity." is unmeaning, a rhetorical flourish, the basis for a detestable hypocrisy.

The above are some of my reasons for offering the proposition. I will now notice a law of the probable reasons in the minds of some for opposing it. I have no objection, if you have the same reason, that a certain wild young man had, who, when asserting that he

D6744_Page_3

could win the heart and mind of a certain young lady, on being asked why he did not, replied, that I have too much respect for her.

If objection is made to Mr. Langston because of his color, we had better reconsider the cases of some of our members, even opposing ones. If because his hair is curly, I would ask if he has not as good right to his natural curls as others to their artificial ones? And why should he be repudiated for them sooner than another man for his bushy face, or towy, or read [sic] head?

What beauty or consistency is there in that benevolence, which with one hand would raise the drunkard from the gutter into which he has plunged himself, while with the other it would shove to oblivion him whom cruel prejudice would doom to banishment from all elevating influences? Or what the consistency in raising the noble colors of temperance to the bowsprit, while to the topmast is raised the black flag of piracy? * * * * * * Although I have frequently visited, talked, and eaten with Mr. Langston, I am not aware of feeling a single "nigger streak" about me. And let me tell you, if you unavoidably find yourself at his door, you will not find the latch string drawn in. He will ask you in very politely, and be ready to converse with you on law, theology, politics, history, the arts and sciences, agriculture, the news of the day, &c., &c. He will treat you gentlemanly, and by the time you bid him good day, you will have forgotten the color of his face!

JAMES FRISBIE.

BROWNHELM, March 9, '55."

This vote of the "Ark" is certainly an anti-slavery triumph, as North Amherst has been known in the past as pro slavery. This is another evidence of the progress of our holy cause. But it is a sad one.

Yours for the Death and Destruction of American Prejudice,

OHIO

FRUIT GROVE, March 14, '55.

Creator

Ohio

Date

1855-03-14

Description

Ohio to Frederick Douglass. PLSr: Frederick DouglassP, 6 April 1855. Bemoans the pervasive nature of prejudice against blacks; provides an essay from a Temperance Association named “Ark.”

Publisher

This document was calendared in the published volume and has not been published in full before

Collection

Frederick Douglass' Paper, 6 April 1855

Type

Letters

Publication Status

Unpublished

Source

Frederick Douglass' Paper