Skip to main content

A Colored Canadian to Frederick Douglass, August 12, 1853

D6454_Page_3

TORONTO, August 12th, 1853.

MR. EDITOR:—Not long since, I saw in
this city, in a large, splendid guilt frame, a
piece of fanciful workmanship, which has
been the admiration of all who have seen it.

D6454_Page_4

It was the work of Mrs. Charity Govans, re-
cently of Baltimore. This lady was, by the
very general invitation of the Managers of
the Maryland Institute, to "all engaged in
industrial pursuits, not only in Baltimore,
and the State of Maryland, but throughout
the United States, to contribute specimens of
their productions for public inspection, and
to compete for the prizes offered by the In-
stitute," induced to contribute the unsur-
passingly beautiful production of her skill,
ingenuity and taste, of which we have spo-
ken. This work was one of so much merit
and attraction, that it was generally antici-
pated that the artificer would be most sig-
nally rewarded. How signally, however,
you will be better prepared to learn, after
you shall have read the following notice and
rule extracted from the printed "regulations
and arrangements for the fourth annual ex-
hibition of American Manufactures, by the
Maryland Institute, held in Baltimore, Octo-
ber, 1851, and signed by the Chairman and
Standing Committee on Exhibition: "The
particular attention of contributors and oth-
ers is requested to these rules, as they will in all cases, be adhered to and enforced."
Rule "15th. The judges are required to
make their decisions strictly upon the merits of the article alone, (the italics are not ours,)
and to make full reports in writing to the
'Committee on Awards, &c.'" Accordingly,
we have a sufficiently "full report, in writ-
ing," as it regards Mrs. Govan's work. I

D6454_Page_5

have copied it from the published reports, for
the edification of your numerous readers:
"No. 1356—A frame of CHENCILLE FLOW-
ERS, made and deposited by Mrs. C. Gevans,
is tastefully designed, ingeniously and accu-
rately executed; in fact we have rarely seen
CHENCILLE FLOWERS more beautifully made
and arranged. But the Committee on Class
15 are unwilling to recommend this piece of
work for a premium. First, because it was
done by a colored woman. In the second
place, we do not deem it advisable to receive
contributions to the exhibitions of the Mary-
land Institute from colored persons, because
if their work is accepted, they will have to
be received as visitors to the fairs. And,
thirdly, the colored population have fairs of
their own, where they can exhibit the pro-
ductions of their industry. Having given

D6454_Page_1

our opinion at length concerning Mrs. Go-
van's work, we leave it with the Committee
on Premiums to decide whether they think
proper to give a premium for it. We would
respectfully advise the Managers of the In-
stitute, if they wish to preserve their exhibi-
tions in good repute, and prevent dissatisfac-
tion on the part of whites and blacks, to de-
cline the acceptance of colored persons'
work at all subsequent exhibitions."

MISS DEBORAH SMITH.

MISS MARY L. OGLE.

MISS SARAH A. YEARLE.

"The Committee are unwilling to recom-
mend this piece of work for a premium, because it was done by a colored woman." The
reason here given for this magnanimous
treatment, is indicative of a littleness,
dwarfish calibre, an ineffable meanness
soul, which, in despite of the copiousness of
our language, and its adaptedness to the ex-
pression of every shade of thought and sen-
timent, it is exceedingly difficult to describe
in terms sufficiently appropriate. Look at
it: We are unwilling to discharge an obvi-
ously assigned duty, a simple act of justice to
a lady of intelligence, wealth, and standing,
"because" she is a "colored woman." The
singular frankness—not to say shamefulness
—of an avowal of a reason so despicable,
and that by ladies whose self-respect permit-
ted them to give their names to the scruti-
nizing gaze of the world in such a connection,

D6454_Page_2

is a mournful evidence of the full influence
of those institutions and prejudices in the
United States, which deteriorates and de-
stroys all that is lovely and liberal, just and
humane, in the human character. These la-
dies, and all whose feelings are equally grov-
elling, should receive the pity of the truly
wise and excellent of the earth, to whose in-
trinsic nobility they are strangers, and whose
good opinion they are incapable of appreci-
ating. We pity, because we cannot envy
them. Again; "If their (the colored peo-
ples') work is accepted, they will have to be
received as visitors to the fairs." A horri-
ble consequence, truly! They will then be
in the same room with ourselves, walk the
same floor, and gaze upon the same objects.
Intolerable! Well, one thing is certain and
inevitable: either the fastidious taste of
these ladies will have to undergo a seasona-
ble and a serious change, or they will be
unable to enter the kingdom of God with
many of these despised ones; for "there
shall, in no wise, enter into it anything
that defileth;" their vitiated taste will ex-
clude them. Are they prepared for the stern,
the unavoidable alternative? These consid-
erations, however, weigh but little in these
days of fashionable, time-serving Christian-
ity. But we must not forget that colored
persons are not excluded from these fairs, if
they will only accompany white visitors as
servants. Special provision is made for all

Page 6

such. The green-eyed monster cannot brook
the sight of a colored gentleman or lady,
whose condition is above that of a servant.
Let him not be alarmed when I tell him that
such sights will become increasingly annoy-
ing and they are destined to put to the se-
verest test the religion and philosophy of the
American Union. He would do well to
make a virtue of necessity. "Thirdly, the
colored population have fairs of their own,
where they can exhibit the production of
their industry." True, but they would no
longer remain in comparative obscurity;
they would, occasionally, place some of the
productions of their skill in juxtaposition,
and in competition with those of their paler
brethren. Speak out, ladies, all your objec-
tions—your worst fears in regard to such a
competition. Remember, we have given you
credit for your frankness. "We would re-
spectfully advise the Managers of the Insti-
tute, if they wish to preserve their exhibi-
tions in good repute, and prevent dissatis-
faction on the part of both whites and blacks,
to decline the acceptance of colored per-
sons' work at all subsequent exhibitions."
Thank you, ladies, we think we understand
you. You mean to say that if colored com-
petitors should be successful, as was Mrs. Go-
vans, in winning admiration, and deserving
highest premiums—of which there would be
a great probability—then the Institute would
suffer in its reputation; and dissatisfaction
on the part of unsuccessful competitors

Page 7

It was the work of Mrs. Charity Govans, recently
of Baltimore. This lady was, by the
very general invitation of the Managers of
the Maryland Institue, to "all engaged in
industrial pursuits, not only in Baltimore,
and the State of Maryland, but throughout
the United States, to contribute specimens
of their productions for public inspection, and
to compete for the prizes offered by the Institute,"
induced to contribute the unsurpassingly
beautiful production of her skill,
ingenuity and taste of which we have
spoken. This work was one of so much merit
and attraction, that it was general anticipated
that the artificer would be most signally
rewarded. How signally, however,
you will be better prepared to learn, after
you shall have read the following notice and
rule extracted from the printed regulations
and arrangements for the fourth annual
exhibition of American Manufacturers, by the
Maryland Institute, held in Baltimore, October,
1851, and signed by the Chairman and
Standing Committee on Exhibition: "The
particular attention of contributors and others
is requested to these rules, as they will
in all cases,
be adhered to and enforced."
Rule 15d. The judges are required to
make their decisions strictly upon the merits
of the article alone,
(the italics are not ours.)
and to make full reports in writing to the
'Committee on Awards, &c'" Accordingly,
we have sufficiently "full report, in writing,"
as it regards Mrs. Govan's work. I
among the whites, would be as inevitable as
it would be with the successful rivals among
the blacks, to whom your silly prejudices
would render you incapable of doing justice.
In view of this unpleasant state of things, I
thank God that I am no more an inhabitant
of your country—my native land—but that
it is my privilege to rejoice that I am now

A COLORED CANADIAN.

Creator

Colored Canadian, A

Date

1853-08-12

Description

A Colored Canadian to Frederick Douglass. PLSr: Frederick DouglassP, 26 August 1853. Reports that artist Charity Govan’s work was refused display in Baltimore because she was black.

Publisher

This document was calendared in the published volume and has not been published in full before.

Collection

Frederick Douglass' Paper

Type

Letters

Publication Status

Unpublished

Source

Frederick Douglass' Paper