Skip to main content

L.D. Tanner to Frederick Douglass, April 17, 1853

D6412_Page_1

MR F. DOUGLASS:—For more than twenty
years I had been personally, or historically
acquainted with Lyndon King; and when the
report came here, that he had restrained the
personal liberty of his daughter, Mary, it ap-
peared to me, either that the report must be
incorrect, or else that Mr. King had been ex-
posed to the power of temptation, by which,
for the time, he had been overcome, and
from which it was to be hoped he would re-
cover, after the kind purposes of God, to
show him his weakness, if not his wickedness,
should have had their influence upon him.—In these facts, after the reports came of the
Allen affair, the mighty heavings of the col-
orphobia volcano were astonishing. I speak
nothing now of the sayings or sympathies of
the outside unbeliever, or open infidel; we
have not many, especially of the last, here;
but I speak of the sympathies and sayings of
church members—high-toned professors of
the religion of Jesus. These, with a few
honorable exceptions, were aroused; and the
various grades of that professed Savior-lov-
ing piety bubbled out in all degrees of ex-
pression, from "I think the blacks ought to
be free, but let them keep in their place," up
to "If he should come after a daughter of
mine, I'd put a bullet through him."

No wonder the name of God is every day
blasphemed through the examples of such
professed Christians. A heathen might well
enquire, "In heavenly minds can such affec-
tions dwell?"

I take the liberty in this connection to ex-
press my opinion, that Mr. Allen should be
received in society, and into all the lawful
relationships of society, as another man of
equal learning, piety and moral worth should
be received.

Since God revealed His mind (Numb. 12)
in reference to Meriam, who spoke against
Moses because he had married an Ethopian
woman, no true child of God has ever valued
humanity by the color of the skin; with him,
"A man's a man for a' that."

Few errors are more common than the ap-
plication of difference motives to men of other
times, under certain courses of action, from
those which acuate persons at the present,
under similar cases of action.

The Priest and Levite, (Luke 10,) who
passed the half dead, wounded man, are now
deemed hard-hearted and unsympathizing;
nothing is probably less true, they were full
of sympathies, they only lacked the practical,
which the press of their own business in an-
other quarter, they deemed, justified them in
leaving it to be performed by other hands,
engaged in less important business, and more
at leizure then their own. There was prob-
ably a feast at Jericho, a seat was to be
selected; or a missionary meeting, and a res-
olution to be advocated; or a revival in pro-
gress, and immortal souls to be saved—so
that their abounding sympathies were nearly
overloaded by well-defined higher motives.—Thus, in this Christian nation, the bleeding,
half dead African stranger, fallen among
thieves, has been greatly cared for, deeply
sympathized with; but if by the care of
some Samaritan, he has been healed, and is
about, like Allen, to step into honorable, so-
cial alliances, he is met with a repulse as
Tom Loker did from uncle Jacob. "Thee is
not wanted here." Association with our no-
ble Anglo-Saxon race will not answer, any
how. You are only niggers. You are poor—in low condition—a degraded race. Can't
bear amalgamation.

D6412_Page_2

But let us be reminded what this nobility
in the Anglo-Saxon race has arisen from.—Start with Japheth, and trace the line, if you
please, to Millard Fillmore and no other
thing is seen so prominent as mixtures—crosses and recrosses, till a distinct race is
the best thing that a sane historian will think
of point out among them—hence their
pride, arrogance, and chivalry. And should
God deal with this nation as He has with
others, and surely He will, as pride goeth
before destruction, and a hauty spirit before
a fall, those now degraded will strike for
freedom; and when "they conquering
come," our beautiful Anglo-Saxon maidens,
with males in the dance, will sing

"None but the brave

Deserve the fair."

And thus another interlace will take place,
by which the unbalanced, overloaded intel-
lect of the one race will be supported by the
attenuated muscle of the other.

Let no one infer by this that I suppose
wedlock should be undiscriminating—that
preferences do not really exist—that suitable-
ness should not always be consulted; yet
so far from suitableness existing in sameness
of color, language, or nation—that these
alone should not enter into the account.—Matrimony is a bond that demands higher
and holier considerations, mightier, interests
being involved. I became an abolitionist as
I became a disciple of Christ, that is, by a
practical adoption of the Savior's precept-
"Therefore, all things whatsoever ye would
that men should do to you, do ye even so to
them." I am out, by the grace of God, for
the absolute equality of races, so far as nat-
ural right and inherent privilege is concern-
ed; and until God has somewhere said in
His word, blessed are ye rich, or proud, or
oppressive, or white, or despiteful, or some-
thing of that sort, I shall be slow to adopt
the doctrine of Anglo-Saxon superiority.—While I believe that Jesus honestly meant
what He said—woe unto you rich, for ye
have received my consolation—let my lot
fall among the poor. While I believe He
meant woe unto you Scribes and Pharisces,
hypocrites, who tithe ment annice and cum-
min, and have omitted judgment, mercy, and
the love of God, let me not omit these holy
duties. It may give me rough fare now, if I
obey them; but let me patiently trust, as Al-
len says, for "The good time coming."

If any one reckons I have talked amalga-
mation here, let him know I have talked the
same since first I became an abolitionist; and
to this hour I have never heard the first re-
verberation of the hated word, that turns so
many faces pale, spoke in reference to my-
self. I think that is the error with many
men, who mean honestly to be reckoned
philanthropists. God, who searcheth the
heart, sees ifs and buts in the background
of their sensibilities. That, I think, is the
error at Central College—the outside is put
on, but, like Miss Opheila, many of the de-
partments, after all, don't feel so in their
hearts. No dark suspicions separated the
poor from little Eva—there was heart in heart. Her friendship was read in the deep
ebullitions of her pure spirit. Let us, with
converted Ophelia, nay, with our honest,
sympathizing Savior, learn the deep lesson,
"A TRUE trust should always be a bold one;
and never fear the coward cry TOO FAR."

In reference to Mr. King's real position in

D6412_Page_3

the affair between Mr. Allen and his daugh-
ter, we are at too great geographical dis-
tance to judge correctly; yet I am of the opin-
ion, upon sober reflection, he will see either
his position has not been a goodly one, or
some of the statements of his professed
friends need correcting.

To Mr. King, personally, I hold no other
sentiments than those of cordial esteem.

With due respect,

L. D. TANNER.

FREETOWN, April 17, 1853.

Creator

Tanner, L. D.

Date

1853-04-17

Description

L.D. Tanner to Frederick Douglass. PLSr: Frederick DouglassP, 29 April 1853. Comments on racial “amalgamation”; references the recent high-profile wedding of William G. Allen, a black man, to Mary G. King, the daughter of renowned white minister Lyndon King.

Publisher

This document was calendared in the published volume and has not been published in full before.

Collection

Frederick Douglass' Paper

Type

Letters

Publication Status

Unpublished

Source

Frederick Douglass' Paper