Skip to main content

Peter Pringle to Frederick Douglass, March 25, 1853

D6385_Page_1

PRINGLE COTTAGE, NEAR MARKLEDOM, March 25th, 1853.

SQUIRE DOUGLASS:—I read, some year and a half ago, some articles in your valuable paper, written by Bob Markle. I have seen nothing over that signature, for a long while. Your admission of that gentleman's articles, emboldens me to drop you a short communication, which, if acceptable, shall be followed by others. If not acceptable, please burn it, and its non-appearance in your paper will be a hint quite sufficient, to the effect that you want no "more of the same sort." I say this, that as a new, unknown and obscure correspondent, you may feel free to treat me according to your own view of the usefulness
of what I write.
I speak, now, upon two subjects, only, one is the recent Slave Law of Illinois, and the other is the purport of your last three editorials.
Of the former, I beg leave to say, that it is a sad and sickening evidence of the entire failure of Democracy, in the United States. Call Democracy by what name you will, its

D6385_Page_2

character is always the same. So you may apply what soubriquet soever, to despotism, it is always, and ever, the same child of Hell. Sometimes, the appropriate cognomen of one of these, is applied to the other. It makes no odds. Misnomers in nomenclature, do not alter or affect intrinsic differences, in character. And you shall find in every government, on the face of the earth, that the two opposite elements of despotism, on the one hand, and Democracy on the other, are in constant, deadly conflict-a conflict that knows no peace, that indeed really, (though it may seemingly,) admits of no truce. The mastery may be on the side of the one, or the other, temporarily, or permanently, the opposite principle, however, whether successfully or unsuccessfully contends though vanquished, struggles, though hopefully, strives though feebly, for the supremacy.
In England, for example, the Democracy, is to be found in the middling classes, the Liberals, moderate churchmen, and the non-conformists. In France, poor God-forsaken France, the Democratic element, though almost crushed out of existence, is to be found among the brave men whose principles are too strong and sterling to be avowed, though they have been obliged to suffer imprisonment, from the tyrant, La Petit Napoleon—In these countries, everybody admits, that despotism is on the side of the claimants of hoary abuses, class legislation, and the denial of popular rights. In some of the European governments, the British,for instance, De-

D6385_Page_3

mocracy is progressing, despotism is yielding. Concession after concession has been made by the latter to the former, for the past two centuries. In France, Democracy triumphed for a few months, only. In Hungary, it was crushed through the treachery of the infamous Bem. And it is but too truthful to add, that the United States has demonstrated, of late, especially in Illinois, that, first, what is called Democracy, is a most intolerable misnomer for despotism; and, secondly, that such despotism is the controlling element of the republic. I know that this has been avowed often enough, by abolitionists, and as pregnantly and as fully proven as avowed. But what I mean, is, that the "Negro Law" of Illinois, proves, that, not only has despotic Democracy controlled the republic as a republic, and that it continues to do so, but that individual States, are yielding to it as States, and that its sway, hereafter, will be unchecked, if not unquestioned. The Democratic principle, found in the Liberty Party and the Free Soil party, or the Free Democracy, in Illinois and elsewhere, is, now defeated, and hopelessly overthrown. The despotism which has controlled, is destined to continue to control, till the judgments of Almighty God shall arrest its course.
I have dwelt so long on the above, that I will not prolong this article, by saying much on the other topic. If permitted, I shall prove by historical facts, what seems to be assumed above, and show some practical con-

D6385_Page_4

clusions from the whole subject.
Trades or starvation! Aye, Squire Douglass, trades or starvation, is the issue presented to colored men, in the directest possible form. You never were nearer the right. I thank you, from my deepest heart, for your articles. I have no more idea, of having my only boy, P. P. Jr., grow up without being fitted to earn his livlihood, by something else than mere menialism, than I have of bringing him up without food or clothing. Difficult or easy, it must be done. So let every one of us resolve, and act accordingly. But I must stop.
Your obedient servant,
PETER PRINGLE.

Creator

Pringle, Peter

Date

1853-03-25

Description

Peter Pringle to Frederick Douglass. PLSr: Frederick DouglassP, 1 April 1853. Wonders about lack of letters from Bob Markle; condemns Illinois’ new “Negro Law”; praises Douglass’s opinion that blacks must learn trades.

Publisher

This document was calendared in the published volume and has not been published in full before.

Collection

Frederick Douglass' Paper

Type

Letters

Publication Status

Unpublished

Source

Frederick Douglass' Paper